In this week's C&EN, this news (article by Max Barnhart):
A coalition of 36 chemistry department chairs from US universities has published an open letter in Science highlighting their concern over recent federal policy decisions impacting science (2025, DOI: 10.1126/science.adx8085).
The letter calls out decisions to decrease overhead rates, reduce funding for science, lay off program managers at scientific agencies, and restrict efforts to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion as detrimental to chemistry research in the US. It states that “failing to support the scientific enterprise will erode decades of progress in research and innovation, ceding leadership in key technological areas to global competitors.”
The authors of the letter are listed alphabetically, and the letter states that the authors’ opinions do not reflect those of their home universities.
Amanda Morris, chair of the chemistry department at Virginia Tech, took the lead in drafting and organizing support for the letter. “We didn’t want the letter to be political,” she says. “We wanted to make an economic stance for why chemical research is critical to the United States and our world prowess as a scientific leader.”
The letter cites American Chemistry Council data that say the chemical industry contributes over $600 billion annually to the US economy and supports over 4 million jobs. But maintaining stable research funding for academic labs is critical for sustaining this economic output, according to the letter’s authors.
Peter B. Armentrout, chair of the chemistry department at the University of Utah and signee of the letter, says that recent policy decisions “may have cost savings in the short term, but it’s going to cause long-term damage to the ability of the United States to perform scientific research and to lead in scientific research.”
It's a good thing to push all the buttons to see what works. Best wishes to them, and to all of us.
Maybe, maybe, the American Chemical Society could stop the slide into irrelevance if it focussed on material issues, such as industrial policy and Health & Safety. Outsourcing continues to be a problem, the CSB and NIOSH are being closed, and academic salaries are fully out of whack with housing prices. Instead, the signatories insist on more diversity happytalk and transgender support. I'm saying that as someone who is litigating a Civil RIghts case with a former employer.
ReplyDeleteThe ACS folks can keep writing 7-figure paychecks for themselves right?
DeleteIt's in their nature.
DeleteCivil rights for thee, but not for trans or Black people, I hear what you're saying
DeleteTrans voices drowning out concerns over defunding of CSB, I hear very well
DeleteAny more comments on this extraordinarily unproductive thread will be deleted.
Delete