The 2020 Chemistry Faculty Jobs List (curated by Andrew Spaeth and myself) has 470 research/teaching positions and 30 teaching assistant professor positions.
Want to add a position? Here's a Google Form to enter positions. In 2019-2020, we will be adding teaching professor positions, targeting positions that demonstrate an intention to renew permanently, 3 year terms and a promotion ladder and/or are titled "assistant teaching professor" or "associate teaching professor." As of 9/20/19, we are adding community college positions if they explicitly offer tenure.
See an error? Please contact us at chemjobber@gmail.com
On November 20, 2018, the 2018 Chemistry Faculty Jobs List had 468 positions.
Here's a link to the first open thread; here's a link to the second. Here is a link to the third open thread, which will close on Tuesday at 12 PM Eastern. Here is the fourth open thread, which will close on Tuesday at noon Eastern. This will be the 5th open thread, which will open on Tuesday, November 19 at noon Eastern.
Can't see additional comments? Look for the "load more" button underneath the comment box.
Want to add a position? Here's a Google Form to enter positions. In 2019-2020, we will be adding teaching professor positions, targeting positions that demonstrate an intention to renew permanently, 3 year terms and a promotion ladder and/or are titled "assistant teaching professor" or "associate teaching professor." As of 9/20/19, we are adding community college positions if they explicitly offer tenure.
See an error? Please contact us at chemjobber@gmail.com
On November 20, 2018, the 2018 Chemistry Faculty Jobs List had 468 positions.
Here's a link to the first open thread; here's a link to the second. Here is a link to the third open thread, which will close on Tuesday at 12 PM Eastern. Here is the fourth open thread, which will close on Tuesday at noon Eastern. This will be the 5th open thread, which will open on Tuesday, November 19 at noon Eastern.
Can't see additional comments? Look for the "load more" button underneath the comment box.
Any word from Brown, U Chicago, Rutgers, or UBC (Biological Chem)?
ReplyDeleteUniversity of North Florida is scheduling on-sites.
ReplyDeleteAppalachian State University is scheduling on-site interviews.
ReplyDeleteAny word from UT San Antonio?
ReplyDeleteAnyone heard from UCLA, UCSD and UCI?
ReplyDeleteUCLA has scheduled onsite interviews
Delete@10.13. What area?
DeleteUCSD has scheduled onsite interviews
Delete@11:33 PM: was that the chem bio position or the pchem position?
Delete@11:43 PM: Synthesis, Materials and Chem Bio was the call I believe
Delete@11:33 Did UCSD just start or did they schedule interviews before?
DeleteScripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO)/UCSD Pharmacy is scheduling remote interviews now.
DeleteNot OP, but someone at my institute was given an onsite with UCSD directly. No phone interview.
DeleteAnything from Carnegie Mellon, Tulane, Tufts, Albany?
ReplyDeleteAlbany had scheduled on sites
Deletenothing from CMU as per a recent post in the last thread. I think Tufts already scheduled on sites.
DeleteCMU is scheduling video interviews
DeleteTulane has scheduled onsite
Delete@5:53 and 8:57. Were these today?
Delete@11:59 I received notification of CMU yesterday.
DeleteWUSTL sent out rejection emails
ReplyDeleteScripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO)/UCSD Pharmacy is scheduling remote interviews.
ReplyDeleteAnything from University of Delaware Biochem.?
ReplyDeleteThey conducted Skype interviews 3 weeks ago
DeleteU Missouri Kansas City is scheduling Zoom interviews.
ReplyDeleteIs this for the physical ?
Delete"Physical, analytical, environmental, or materials chemistry to start August 2020. Priority may be given to research programs addressing large-scale data, computational analysis, and modeling."
DeletePrinceton has scheduled their on-sites.
ReplyDeletewhat area?
DeleteAs far as I know, they've scheduled a couple of chem bio people. Don't know about the others.
DeleteAlso some materials people
DeleteIf you had a phone interview, thought it went well, but it's a week after their projected timeline for contacting you for an on-site, is it appropriate to email them?
ReplyDeleteGo for it, but to me 1 week doesn't mean much. No one ever actually follows their own deadlines/timelines, academia is always slower than you or they think.
DeleteYou can write them but it doesn't mean they will answer. Sometimes the chair won't reply anymore if you're not in the top three.
DeleteAny news from Rutgers?
ReplyDeletewhich one are you talking about?
DeleteBiophysical chemistry
DeleteI haven’t heard anything from them at all.
DeleteI assume we still have hope then? They are working on two positions, maybe that is why it takes this long. Fingers crossed.
DeleteIn regards to these comments from the last thread:
ReplyDelete"AnonymousNovember 16, 2019 at 9:23 AM
Can anyone speak to University of Denvers failed search last year. Was it because they lost their candidate or was it funding issues?
AnonymousNovember 16, 2019 at 11:57 AM
I phone interviewed there last year. Based on that, and the comments on here from last year, it doesn't seem like they ever moved forward with onsites. We all got emails in like February saying the search had been cancelled. It may have been funding, but I know personally that they are filling a position from a professor who didn't get tenure, so I assume it shouldn't have been funding. Maybe they just weren't interested in us last year?"
We (DU chemistry - although I only speak for my own opinion here) did have onsite interviews last year. There are allot of dynamics and opinions that go into making an offer or not to an individual after that point. I won't speak to the specifics of why we chose to cancel the search last year, but I can say that it was not due to money or anything of that nature. In a very simple sense it got very late in the game and we decided that we were willing to try again this year. A faculty search is a lot of work for everyone in the department, so that is not a flippant decision. This does not mean that there weren't good and very qualified candidates left in the pool at that point.
For this years search we are conducting our first round of telephone interviews in early December. On sites will be scheduled for January. We may go back to the pool if we can't find someone through this initial process. It is hard on both sides of the table. Even at the initial stage I fought and pushed for candidates that we aren't phone interviewing next week. While not all applications are competitive, there are so many good applications that we don't get to move forward with.
Thanks for the detailed explanation and update from the other side!
Deleteany update from NJIT (inorganic) and New Mexico Tech?
ReplyDeleteNM Tech has requested letters
DeleteCurious about LSU too, I guess they started review process at 10/30/19, anyone heard anything from there?
ReplyDeleteI was missing an LoR and they were responsive then (10/25ish) via email. So who knows
DeleteHeard that they probably have decided who to bring on campus. Not sure if they have actually made the move.
DeleteHas anyone heard anything from them?
DeleteGot an email from Georgia State (organic) - that my application made it through and will be reviewed again as they make a short-list. Interesting not-quite-interview; but better than a rejection or ghosting.
ReplyDeleteI know I had some difficulty finding a way to submit my application for that position--did you apply through the Science Careers website?
Deletehonestly I don't remember. There were a few confusing applications this year. I feel like there were buried instructions somewhere.
Delete@ 9:14 - Yep, that was my experience. They had a very restrictive file size limit on the submission through Science Careers. I couldn't compress my PDF enough to make it fit and it isn't extremely long or figure-heavy. I ended up uploading my cover letter and emailing the rest of my application.
Delete@2:21 (same as OP?) did you receive the same email that your application "made it through"? I'm wondering if this corresponds to some kind of first cut or if I should be worried that my submission through Science Careers wasn't received -9:14 poster
Deletei think it was a cut list.
DeleteHello, @9:14/9:24, this is @2:21. I am not OP. I did not receive a "made it through" email aside from the immediate confirmation from Science Careers, but just yesterday (11/27) I received an email from GSU requesting that I fill out the demographics survey, so I would assume my application has advanced and I'm still in the running despite the difficult submission.
DeleteBerkeley started scheduling their on-sites for polymer/organic, it is likely their search is separate for different positions.
ReplyDeleteHas anyone heard from the George Washington Univ biorganic position after the Skype interview a few weeks ago?
ReplyDeletehaven't heard back yet either
DeleteHas anybody heard from HMS (cell biology), OHSU or MSK?
ReplyDeleteReceived the rejection letter for Washington University at St Louis on chemistry (open field).
ReplyDeleteRejection for me
DeleteHas anyone heard from the UC Merced synthetic position or the CUNY organic?
ReplyDeleteUC Merced conducted Skype interviews this past week.
DeleteAnybody get news from UIUC after their remote interviews?
ReplyDeleteUIUC has scheduled their on-campus interviews.
DeleteAh I see. Sometimes the rejection after a Skype interview sucks more than hearing nothing...
DeleteThey have their candidates listed now...
DeleteDid anyone got any news from Notre-Dame University?
ReplyDeleteNotre Dame is currently conducting on-sites.
DeleteIs this for the TT or Teach position?
DeleteFrom 12:44 PM: I was referring to TT. Not sure about Teach.
Delete@ 12:44/9:24. Thanks. The teach position's priority deadline isn't until Dec but just wanted to double check.
Delete@12:44 PM, what area?
DeleteUniversity of Tampa just wrapped up their on-sites.
ReplyDeleteHas anyone heard from The College of New Jersey since video interviews over a month ago?
ReplyDeleteOnsite interviews have already begun at TCNJ.
DeleteThanks for the update.
DeleteHave anyone heard anything back from Baylor University after webEx interview like ten days ago?
ReplyDeleteThey have scheduled on-site interviews
Deletei got an email last night from Baylor for demographic information...curious on why they ask for my demographic information if i am not scheduled for onsite.
Delete@7:16 PM, what area?
Deletethe organic position
Delete@2:26 pm thank you for sharing
DeleteGet rejection email from baylor after webex interview
DeleteHas anyone heard from Temple University since phone interviews over two weeks ago?
ReplyDeleteTemple has started scheduling on-site interviews
Delete@3:59pm is that for organic asis prof position?
DeleteHow much time do you guys put into preparing for the on-site interviews? Particularly at PUIs.
ReplyDeletei would like to ask the same question...but particularly at R1s.
DeleteThe first one of course takes a ton of work, but I have some that are back to back with only a day in between so I'm just doing what I can... These are R1s, though.
DeleteThe teaching demos take soooo long to prepare for. And every school's topic requests are unique.
DeleteMy first one I prepared literally 4 days straight - this was due to some imposter syndrome and me thinking I wouldn't actually get any on-sites, so I didn't put any work into job talks before I got invitations for on-sites AND it was a pretty quick turnaround. I was very lucky that my teaching demos were the first few because those really do take a while to prepare for (thinking about potential questions, for example). By the end, it was mostly an hour or so refreshing myself on some details of each school the night before in the hotel. I applied to several different types/sizes of PUIs so the answers to their questions aren't always the same!
DeleteFor my onsite interviews at PUIs, I would start to outline my plans and do some additional reading on the institution and faculty as soon as the interview was being planned (typically 2+ weeks before the actual interview). One week before the interview, I would actually create the first draft of my teaching demo. Leading up to the interview, I would revisit my teaching demo on a daily basis to make adjustments. About 2 or 3 days before my first interview, I made sure to practice my teaching demo in front of some peers to teach to an actual audience and receive honest feedback and suggestions. The day before my interview and with my teaching demo ready to go, I would make adjustments to my research presentation to customize to the department's research interests and facilities available. I do think it pays off to invest time in the teaching demo assuming you already have a polished research talk ready to go. Also it helps to memorize some general questions to help you get through some meetings when you are feeling exhausted and your interviewer keeps asking you for questions.
DeleteHas anybody heard from Auburn since the phone interviews?
ReplyDeleteThey said it would take at least 2 weeks to make a decision. At best we might hear before thanksgiving, but probably won't be until after.
DeleteAuburn has scheduled some on-sites. I don't know for sure whether that's an exhaustive list though.
DeleteDid you just hear from them today? Thanks.
DeleteOglethorpe contacted me about a scheduling a phone interview, then never got back to me after that. I even followed up but didn't hear anything. Did anyone else have this happen?
ReplyDeleteWould anyone like to share their experiences with the research proposal talk/session during onsites?
ReplyDeleteIndeed - what are they looking for here? Detailed timelines (Gantt charts?) of individual projects? Details on number of grad students/postdocs/staff scientists? Specific funding calls and when we'll apply? Backup plans (if x fails, we move to y). 10 year vision? 20 year vision? Or do they want just hardcore detailed science, without the administrative stuff? Both?
DeleteI'm heading to my very first on-site in a week or so and would also appreciate this so much.
DeleteI've had one on-campus interview (smaller R1 with extensive UG research program), so this experience is limited but here goes as best as I can remember:
Delete- What equipment/infrastructure is needed to succeed?
- How many grad/UG students would I be looking to hire? Which of my projects would be suitable for UGs?
- Funding, funding, funding! Where would I apply, which projects would be funded by which source, and what would I do if not funded initially.
- I included a back-up idea slide for each project, and was asked to elaborate on them for a couple of projects.
- What collaborations would I be seeking, both internally and externally?
- What could I bring to the school that others did not (experience and equipment)?
- What classes do I want to teach? How could my knowledge/experience broaden the UG/Grad experience at [redacted]?
TBH more of the questions were based on the logistics of the position rather than a hardcore grilling of the science. Not every school will be like this of course, but as the position is to fill in a gap of expertise rather than add to a department strength, I also didn't expect too many in-detail questions.
Remember that one of the main things they want to evaluate is whether you're a person they want to work with for the next 30ish years, so showing some personality and collegiality is not necessarily a bad thing. Hope that this helps a little, and good luck!!
@10:53
Delete1) Ish, but Gantt charts are probably too far. They want to know what you'll be working on first.
2) Yes, how large of a group you intend to maintain.
3) No, but they want to know what agencies.
4) Yes, you wrote at least three proposals, didn't you? But keep in mind you only have 5-6 years to make them work, so they should all be related, and preferably your primary project is multifaceted (see point 1).
5/6) They're more interested in seeing you funded, published, and tenured (see 1 and 4). This is more covered by point 2.
7/8) Mostly scientific. Mine were mostly R1s. As per 2:10, I wouldn't call it a grilling, but the definitely were ensuring you knew your stuff.
These can be heavily/sparsely attended. Expect people to come and go. Some might want an actual chalk talk, though it's mostly powerpoint. They should have a whiteboard available still. Expect questions you don't know the answer to and answer honestly, though the ability to think on your feet is a plus. You should walk away with improved proposals hopefully. It's about what you'd expect, and you have, of course, practiced this portion in front of your current peers.
All of 2:10's points are good too. If you haven't thought about equipment/infrastructure, you should sit down, list it, and price it all out, both accessed equipment/services and what you'll need personally. They may not ask in the chalk talk, but the chair will want to know. Overall, I would reemphasize 2:10s last point. You are interviewing to join a new research group, comprised of 1st - 50th years. And they want someone they can get along with.
Good luck, and happy Thanksgiving.
Stetson University is conducting Skype interviews this week and next week, with campus interviews occurring mid-January
ReplyDeleteAny word from Chico State about on-sites?
ReplyDeleteMay I know when they did phone interview? I guess then I didn’t make it...
DeleteBrown scheduling on-sites (pchem)
ReplyDelete:(
Deleteindeed...
DeleteCornell scheduling on-sites (Organic)
ReplyDeleteUniversity of Colorado Denver is scheduling Skype interviews.
ReplyDeleteWhat area? Thanks!
DeleteAnalytical at the Assistant Prof level
DeleteHas anyone heard anything about WVU organic position?
ReplyDeleteI was contacted about a missing LoR about a month ago. But thats it...
DeleteUT Dallas is scheduling on-sites for its theory position.
ReplyDeleteWas not there deadline to submit application 3oth November??
Delete@12:07 AM: You are right. I honestly don't know what happened, but it looks like they are doing on a rolling basis?
DeleteAny news about University of Florida?
ReplyDeleteHave you heard anything from MIT?
ReplyDeleteAs an alumnus of MIT I have started to see onsite advertisements.
DeleteThere has been one on site already.
DeleteAnything from U. Houston or Miami University for polymer area?
ReplyDeleteI believe from an earlier thread that University of Miami scheduled interviews. University of Houston has already wrapped up their on-site interviews.
DeleteUniversity of Miami has conducted onsite interviews.
DeleteIs there any university that schedules on site directly without Skype/phone interviews? Or is a constant that phone interviews define if you get on site?
ReplyDeleteI've heard of several going straight to onsite. Houston, UCSD, Cornell, Florida State, Berkeley come to mind.
DeleteI got 2 on site invites from PUIs without a prior Skype/phone interview.
DeleteAfter what date should I consider to apply to industry jobs more seriously?
ReplyDeleteNow. If you are even considering industry, start now. Positions fall through all the time and large companies have a ton of HR hoops to jump through to make hires.
DeleteOr, if you're intended to reapply next year, figure out who is on your institute's hiring committee and ask one or more of them to give you honest feedback on your application. Then get cracking on getting another paper out and improving your proposals. You could ask your postdoc or grad advisor too. There is generally a triage of applications based on number of publications. At the very least they could help you know if you're over that and into the crapshoot that is getting an interview. Good luck.
DeleteHas anybody heard from University of Minnesota?
ReplyDeleteNot since my phone interview
DeleteTimeline is that they need to meet with the committee first, then around the start of Dec is when they will start inviting on-sites
DeleteDid Ole Miss already schedule on-site interviews?
ReplyDeleteUW-Madison scheduling Zoom interviews
ReplyDeleteSenior level theoretical?
DeleteNo, though it would be hilarious to make associate/higher level professors go through zoom interviews to be poached mid-to-late career :)
DeleteWhich area?
Deletefor the newly posted UCR position on "faculty diversity on physical science", does that mean the faculty have to do extra service to promote diversity, or does the candidate have to be a diversity hire (minority group)?
ReplyDeleteLikely the latter
Delete"Preference will also be given to applicants who have evidence of or strong potential for commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion for underrepresented students and groups, and can integrate those values with teaching, research, and service."
DeleteThe ad reads like they're looking for faculty who have inclusive research and/or service. Not extra service "Preference will also be given to applicants who have evidence of or strong potential for commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion for underrepresented students and groups, and can integrate those values with teaching, research, and service."
The ad reads like they're looking for faculty committed to inclusive teaching, research, and service. Not extra service or a "diversity hire."
Is it legal to limit the hire to certain groups?
DeleteI think it is illegal to say that only a certain group of candidate will be considered, but it is often the case under the table. The description in this ad is not very clear (at least to me), but I think it is the case where they want a diversity hire (speculation only).
DeleteNo further discussion on this position is welcome. There are plenty of other places to discuss these issues on the internet.
DeleteClemson is scheduling WebEx interviews.
ReplyDeleteAny word from UT Arlington, UT Austin or UT San Antonio?
ReplyDeleteUT Austin has already posted their on-campus interview schedule online...
DeleteAny word from GWU and VCU?
ReplyDeleteGW has scheduled on-site interviews
DeleteWhich area?
DeleteBioorganic for GW
Deletehas anyone heard from Marquette University?
ReplyDeleteNothing yet for me...
DeleteUMass is scheduling Zoom interviews for its computational materials chemistry position.
ReplyDeleteWestern Michigan University is scheduling remote interviews.
ReplyDeleteAnyone hear from Ithaca College after phone interviews?
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone have an example of a start up cost estimation for an R2 or smaller R1 institution? A few of the applications request this and I honestly have no idea what to put and how to write it up. Any advice would be much appreciated.
ReplyDeletesome vague data: http://chemjobber.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-median-chemistry-professor-startup.html
DeleteThanks. That is a good start as far as ballpark numbers. I was hoping someone would have some insight into format and how much you should account for each student more specifically. I guess glovebox, lines, and pumps are a bit easier to estimate. But I have no idea what to put for a grad student?
Deletefollow this for the next 24 hours: https://twitter.com/Chemjobber/status/1199748745862074368
DeleteI try to break it down into categories like a funding proposal would: equipment (>$5k), supplies/small equipment, salary, and travel. I do not include indirect costs since institutional policies are complex and it varies with funding source; they will factor indirect in if it applies to start up. You should get quotes for all significant equipment and list specific models you are considering. Then just shop around on laboratory suppliers for mid price stuff like balances, hot plates or whatever else your lab will need in the appropriate quantities. For supplies, $10k per researcher per year is kind of a safe value for continuing operations, but that would probably include replacement of things like stir plates etc.
DeleteI always have vendors quote major items for my current institution, the companies you ask for quotes will ask where it is for, it is kind of optional whether you want to disclose that this is pricing for a startup budget or just vaguely that you are thinking about buying it. You don't need to bargain for the best price or anything at this stage, if anything, you want higher prices to make sure you will able to afford it when you are ready to purchase. Vendors will give you a lot of attention if you tell them it is for start up in my experience and they will pry about every detail.
Salaries are tricky, the university may cover that with TA etc for the grad students and it most likely comes out of a different pool of funds than postdoc salary and equipment, so don't assume you could convert salary money to supplies, equipment, or travel.
The budget is probably partially to test if you understand what it takes to get your independent research started, and partially to test whether they can afford it.
I think grad student salaries generally range from about $21k to $35k per year + you pay their tuition and benefits (health insurance etc). In general, all of that will be covered when they are on TA. They should generally TA for the first three semesters. Availability of TA slots also varies with the size of the undergraduate program. Tuition obviously varies widely. In California you usually pay in state tuition because most California schools require their students to become state residents. Other states and private you probably end up paying out of state tuition/private tuition.
DeleteYou don't necessarily have to budget it exactly. You could simply state how many graduate students you would like support for. My offer guaranteed several TA lines for the first few years, and when you start multiplying lines x years x $50-$80k (stipend + tuition + fringe, as it would be for an RA), that adds up to a lot, quickly.
DeleteFor most chemistry departments, they have such a large teaching load that it is not a hardship for them to provide TA lines, they generally guarantee their students support through this mechanism. However, if you're in a biochemistry department or a med chem department where TA lines are not so readily available, you will want to make sure funding for student support is there.
does anybody know if rockefeller scheduled their on-sites after the zoom interviews?
ReplyDeleteAnyone know about:
ReplyDeleteUniversity of Kansas Molecular Biosciences
Indiana Chemistry (Chem Bio)
Oregon Health Sciences University
University of Maryland Baltimore County (Chemical Biology)
Minnesota Medicinal Chemistry
Michigan Med. Biological Chemistry
I just got an email from OHSU that my application was forwarded to the search committee on Monday, so I assume they haven't met yet.
DeleteAny news from Univ of North Georgia about onsite?
ReplyDeleteHas anybody ever emailed a search chair after not getting chosen for an on-site (after remote interview) to ask why? Or perhaps ways to improve?
ReplyDeleteI emailed after my remote or onsite interviews failed. Only two professors replied with honest comments about my performance. I think it is nice to get some feedback, but not all faculty members want to give it (especially at an early stage).
DeleteHaving sat on both sides of the fence, I think this is very frustrating.
DeleteInterviewers don't want to enter into "debates" with candidates on why their judgement was wrong, as well as the threat of lawsuits. Interviewers don't want to defend their prejudiced colleagues. Interviewers have already spent hundred odd hours screening packets, conducting interviews and site visits.
But as a candidate it sucks. If you developed a good rapport with one prof, humbly ask for "how would you recommend improving my hireability as a candidate", and promise not to sue. .....
Someone has received and accepted an offer from Haverford. CU-Boulder is scheduling remote interview for its theory position.
ReplyDeleteYale Chem-E is requesting the upload of reference letters on interfolio. What that means?
ReplyDeleteFor chemical engineering? I guess you have entered the short list.
DeleteI was wondering the same. I thought maybe they just added the reference request field to the interfolio and emailed everyone who applied?
DeleteJust got an email that UW-Platteville will not be filling the position.
ReplyDeleteI also received that email
DeleteSame here
DeleteDear friends please do not get disappointed if you did not receive a call. The process many times involves throwing luck into wind. A person I know got an interview at Berkeley with just 2 first author publications, while another of my friends with 33 publications got one call from a top 100 university. Life is just like that
ReplyDeleteThat's certainly an accurate description of this process; however, it is probably little solace to somebody not getting any interviews.
DeleteHas anyone heard anything from University of Pittsburgh?
ReplyDeleteI heard they have finished their remote interviews. Not sure about the onsites though.
DeleteAnyone heard back from Stanford ChEM-H after zoom interview?
ReplyDeleteThey have already scheduled onsites. Sorry. :(
DeleteHave you heard anything from Penn State after Skype interviews?
ReplyDeleteThey have scheduled some onsites.
DeleteHappy Thanksgiving everyone. Hope everyone is able to find some time to relax during this horribly stressful time. And thanks so much to ChemJobber for continuing to put together this great resource every year. My family has foregone duck this year in your honor.
ReplyDeleteUCLA on-sites schedule is available now.
ReplyDeleteAny word from University of Vermont Assistant Prof Analytical position? That deadline passed a while back (10/1) and I haven't noticed an updates here.
ReplyDeleteAny word from Cal State Long Beach?
ReplyDeleteAny updates regarding UChicago?
ReplyDeleteI heard they are still reviewing materials.
DeleteIt has only been 4 days since my Skype interview. Maybe we’ll hear something next week?
ReplyDeleteFor U Chicago?
DeleteWhat area for the U Chicago skype interview?
DeleteChembio
DeleteHappy Thanksgiving, everyone! Have a good holiday.
ReplyDeleteThanks for making this blog possible ��
DeleteHappy Thanksgiving.
ReplyDeleteWhere do you think departments and the dean typically stand on allocating funds for start up?
ReplyDeleteFrom my undergrad/grad/postdoc institutions, it seemed like there was some incentive to keep costs under control and spending more for a current hire would cost them for future hires. However, when I interviewed in a previous cycle, the department clearly wanted to push for as big of package as possible with the dean. This was with a department showing strong research growth/improvement in a university showing the same.
Specifically, who really controls the account with the startup funds? My impression is the department usually has a certain amount and the dean would have final approval authority, but how common is it for the dean to control startup funds without predetermined departmental allocations?
Salve Regina University is scheduling campus interviews
ReplyDelete