Check out the latest moves here!
To submit information, click here or e-mail chembumpercars@gmail.com
1. HELPING CHEMISTS FIND JOBS IN A TOUGH MARKET. 2. TOWARDS A QUANTITATIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE QUALITY OF THE CHEMISTRY JOB MARKET.
Check out the latest moves here!
To submit information, click here or e-mail chembumpercars@gmail.com
What's the job market like for chemists? Dude -- it's always bad.*
How bad is it? How the heck should I know? Quantifying the chemistry job market is what this blog is about. That, and helping chemists find jobs.
E-mail chemjobber with helpful tips, career questions or angry comments at chemjobber -at- gmail dotcom. All correspondence is kept confidential. (Didn't get an e-mail back? It's okay to try again.) Please address correspondence to "Chemjobber" or "CJ."
Voicemail/SMS: (302) 313-6257
Twitter: @chemjobber
RSS feed here
(The Blogger spam filter gets hungry sometimes, and likes to eat comments. You can e-mail me, and sometimes I can get it to cough up your comment. I am always happy to try.)
(*For the literal-minded, this is a joke. Mostly.)
Out of curiosity, what are the career implications for failing to get tenure at a top tier institution?
ReplyDeleteI imagine there is no road back to the limelight. I also imagine it is difficult to recruit students that are "in the know" about your situation.
With all the resources available to a new lab at a top tier R1 I would be quite hesitant to work for someone that failed there. Few bigger red flags can be imagined, for me.
People in top tier institutions that get denied tenure often end up in top tier institutions (just slightly lower in the rankings).
DeleteMost of them end up having really successful research program elsewhere.
Some may go as teaching professors in other institutions.
Some may end up in the industry doing successful corporate research.
You must be mistaking being denied tenure for failure. Failure is on you. Being denied tenure depends of many factors: teaching, service, funding, students, your field of research, butting heads with faculty or dean, or "fit" whatever that means.
Few bigger red flags can be imagined for someone who thinks like the OP; fortunately, it's anonymous.
Failure to be granted tenure is most definitely a failure, tautologically.
DeleteThe factors you mentioned are of material consequence to prospective students and the results of the tenure decision are an indirect (but very strong) indication of those factors.
Moving from a top 10 institution to a maybe top 100 is no small fall. It doesn't seem to happen very often. I would strongly advise anyone I know to avoid working for a PI in that position if possible.
This thread has reached the end of its productive life.
DeleteI recall a "Meet the Speaker" discussion in grad school where a well-known PI explained his reasons for moving departments. He had started his career at a department known for frequently denying tenure, and this motivated him to job-hunt. He was granted tenure, but ended up getting a better offer elsewhere and moving his group. Both departments were in the top 25 or so, and the PI involved is a famous bigshot with a highly successful career.
ReplyDeleteI had the same experience speaking with a PI and had a couple of meetings with different PIs in top-50 schools that were denied tenure in top-10 departments that now have research and groups bigger and better funded than the average group at the current institution. It goes without saying that it's not the norm, but it's not the exception as well.
Delete