Chart credit: Calculated Risk blog |
More analysis as commentary rolls in.
Thanks, as always, to Calculated Risk for the chart.
1. HELPING CHEMISTS FIND JOBS IN A TOUGH MARKET. 2. TOWARDS A QUANTITATIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE QUALITY OF THE CHEMISTRY JOB MARKET.
Chart credit: Calculated Risk blog |
What's the job market like for chemists? Dude -- it's always bad.*
How bad is it? How the heck should I know? Quantifying the chemistry job market is what this blog is about. That, and helping chemists find jobs.
E-mail chemjobber with helpful tips, career questions or angry comments at chemjobber -at- gmail dotcom. All correspondence is kept confidential. (Didn't get an e-mail back? It's okay to try again.) Please address correspondence to "Chemjobber" or "CJ."
Voicemail/SMS: (302) 313-6257
Twitter: @chemjobber
RSS feed here
(The Blogger spam filter gets hungry sometimes, and likes to eat comments. You can e-mail me, and sometimes I can get it to cough up your comment. I am always happy to try.)
(*For the literal-minded, this is a joke. Mostly.)
I call bullsh!t. What about all those who've maxed out their unemployment benefits? They magically disappear from the government rosters.
ReplyDeleteI also see that statistic as misleading. My bro and his friends had to join the military. Life was stagnant and there were just too few opportunities. Govt is eating up some of the private sector workers, but it also leaves a lot of private sector workers out on their bums because of inefficiency. With the govt taking over 40% of our GDP, I don't think the private sector is expanding at all, it's actually contracting. So even if unemployment goes down a little or stays stagnant, it may just be a sign that the govt is finding new ways to employ people at 10% unemployment. But in terms of meaningful productive, private, employment, that may actually take many more years at the current spending levels.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.usgovernmentspending.com/us_20th_century_chart.html