Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1. HELPING CHEMISTS FIND JOBS IN A TOUGH MARKET. 2. TOWARDS A QUANTITATIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE QUALITY OF THE CHEMISTRY JOB MARKET.
What's the job market like for chemists? Dude -- it's always bad.*
How bad is it? How the heck should I know? Quantifying the chemistry job market is what this blog is about. That, and helping chemists find jobs.
E-mail chemjobber with helpful tips, career questions or angry comments at chemjobber -at- gmail dotcom. All correspondence is kept confidential. (Didn't get an e-mail back? It's okay to try again.) Please address correspondence to "Chemjobber" or "CJ."
Voicemail/SMS: (302) 313-6257
Twitter: @chemjobber
RSS feed here
(The Blogger spam filter gets hungry sometimes, and likes to eat comments. You can e-mail me, and sometimes I can get it to cough up your comment. I am always happy to try.)
(*For the literal-minded, this is a joke. Mostly.)
Actually, Paul's just paraphrasing Nate Lewis' analysis of the energy balance. The presentation by Professor Lewis and Dan Nocera is not new. And neither is the stubborn refusal of Americans to do the same simple math that Lewis and Nocera do. Corn ethanol is dumb, it's a fact not an opinion. Even the National Geographic did an article on it a while ago, and gave enough data to do the math and show it.
ReplyDeleteI agree with 6:18. Nothing really new, just coming from someone that is actually in the trenches of science.
ReplyDeleteThe Cato Institute has been harping on the stupidity of energy initiates such as ethanol for awhile. They even poke some fun at the AAAS banner used in 2007 promoting corn as a source of fuel:
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=13428
The article also goes into some detail over how dumb govt funded science can get.
But this is Cato, we can't trust those guys...or can we?
Even conservatives (or libertarians depending on your definition) were wise to this game:
ReplyDeletehttp://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2008/03/12/big_corn_and_ethanol_hoax
Scienceblogs typically describes Williams as an:
"Economist Walter Williams, a predictable right wing hack if ever there was one"
http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2011/04/walter_williams_how_dare_acade.php
So it doesn't take a PhD in chemistry, nor liberal bias, to figure out that ethanol is one of the dumbest things to come tumbling out of science funding.
However, Paul recovers during the later half of the article by covering other energy sources. Though our hopes were not raised much.