Highest concentrations of chemists (Area, number of chemists / chemists per thousand jobs)
- Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA: 590 / 6.17
- Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metropolitan Division: 1,920 / 6.11
- College Station-Bryan, TX: 450 / 4.90
- Durham, NC: 1,010 /3.78
- Bethesda-Frederick-Gaithersburg, MD Metropolitan Division: 1,670 / 3.02
- Pine Bluff, AR: 100 / 3.02
- Boulder, CO: 450 / 2.94
- Framingham, MA NECTA Division: 390 / 2.55
- Columbia, MO: 200 / 2.47
- Newark-Union, NJ-PA Metropolitan Division: 2,300 / 2.42
Never ceases to amaze, the ability of a nearby university or government facility (looking at you, Pine Bluff) to skew statistics in interesting ways.
Nevada???
ReplyDeleteI am more surprised by the Tri-cities (That is what we call the Kennewick-Pasco-Richland). I grew up a few hours from there and frankly have no idea what those people are doing there.
ReplyDeleteArea 51 has chemists!!!
ReplyDeleteTri-Cities has Pacific Northwest National Laboratories, which regularly posts postdoc positions on ACS Careers. (Go Bombers!)
ReplyDeletew/r/t Nevada, I assume that it's Nellis AFB and the associated military installations.
Pine Bluff is the Center for Drug Toxicology at Pine Bluff Arsenal.
ReplyDeleteBut it looks like this basically selects for Chemists who have one of the very few jobs in a whole location. I.e. you work in a county that has very few employers beyond fast food.
ReplyDeleteYes, A9:19a. You can take the top ten list and split them by # of total jobs, #2, 5, 10 versus everyone else.
ReplyDeleteMore or less bimodal distribution, which is why county-level maps are fun/skewing.
Thanks, A9:18.
ReplyDeleteAll right New Mexico and Wyoming!
ReplyDeleteI don't get what's up with New Mexico. Los Alamos National Labs has some top-notch nuclear and inorganic chemists. Plus, there's got to be chemists (at least academically employed) in Wyoming and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
ReplyDeletemeth labs in nevada?
ReplyDeleteNevada is interesting but what puzzles me more is central oregon, idaho and southern montana...
ReplyDeleteThere's some funky "gerrymandering" going on here. Just look at the largest 0.67-0.85 region encompassing most of Kansas, excluding what I believe are major cities. Still, WTH kind of districting is THAT?!
ReplyDeleteKansas needs chemists as pesticide and fertilizer sales people?
ReplyDeleteA11:02: The divisions aren't congressional districts, they're metropolitan statistical areas, which is a unit that is used for these statistical analyses.
ReplyDeleteCentral Oregon: I have no idea. Bend Research, perhaps?
Idaho = Idaho National Laboratories (?)
Southern Montana: Montana State (?)
western Utah -> Dugway Proving grounds
ReplyDeleteRe Oregon: Good call on Bend Research; also Molecular Probes/Invitrogen, some Materials-type work at semiconductor plants and UO/OSU aren't too far from each other. Also, it probably looks more impressive when there's not a lot of other jobs in the area.
ReplyDeleteIs there any non-meth related chemistry going on in Fargo, ND? Also, what's with that crazy looking "metropolitan statistical area" spanning North Texas?
ReplyDelete