Thursday, June 26, 2014

Proud to say, I've been rejected by Nature Chemistry

This was pretty fun, and pretty funny. But I should say that it was 99.5% my coworker's ideas and efforts. 
Posted by at
Labels:

6 comments:

  1. OldnukeJune 26, 2014 at 8:22 PM

    And don't forget the "chemical-free" aerosols -- 14 oz can of vacuum. This is one product that you can say truly sucks and get no argument! gr

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownJune 27, 2014 at 12:21 AM

    A truly great review of the field, obviously Nature Chemistry didn't quite see the importance!

    ReplyDelete
  3. qvxbJune 27, 2014 at 9:35 AM

    The critique of some aspects of modern life that was given by C. Berry in 1956 applies to the idea of chemical-free products - " Too much monkey business for me to be involved in!"

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJune 27, 2014 at 10:01 AM

    You didn't get published because you failed to include 12 pages of supplementary figures and tables

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HapJune 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM

      Maybe he'll learn: next time, publish in Angewandte. Or Tetrahedron Letters.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJune 27, 2014 at 2:55 PM

      He'll have to make it punnier for Angewandte. Maybe try one of the open access journals. I hear some of them will publish anything.

      Delete

looks like Blogger doesn't work with anonymous comments from Chrome browsers at the moment - works in Microsoft Edge, or from Chrome with a Blogger account - sorry! CJ 3/21/20

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)