Photo credit: NPR/Planet Money |
(I believe that pharmaceutical manufacturing is where pharma jobs get classified; I don't believe we get put under the health care category.)
Looks like folks working retail are slightly better off. Huh.
1. HELPING CHEMISTS FIND JOBS IN A TOUGH MARKET. 2. TOWARDS A QUANTITATIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE QUALITY OF THE CHEMISTRY JOB MARKET.
Photo credit: NPR/Planet Money |
What's the job market like for chemists? Dude -- it's always bad.*
How bad is it? How the heck should I know? Quantifying the chemistry job market is what this blog is about. That, and helping chemists find jobs.
E-mail chemjobber with helpful tips, career questions or angry comments at chemjobber -at- gmail dotcom. All correspondence is kept confidential. (Didn't get an e-mail back? It's okay to try again.) Please address correspondence to "Chemjobber" or "CJ."
Voicemail/SMS: (302) 313-6257
Twitter: @chemjobber
RSS feed here
(The Blogger spam filter gets hungry sometimes, and likes to eat comments. You can e-mail me, and sometimes I can get it to cough up your comment. I am always happy to try.)
(*For the literal-minded, this is a joke. Mostly.)
Gotta love that the financial sector is responsible for the mess that we're in and yet their loss of jobs is barely a blip on the radar. Real comforting to know that when these greedy SOBs gamble it isn't for their own jobs, but other people's.
ReplyDeleteChemjobber: Perhaps chemists and other professional researchers (is that the same as research professionals?) are classified as "unpersons" who can be conveniently overlooked by the New Great Society. Oh well, so much for my aspirations of becoming an Inner Party Member.
ReplyDeleteFrom what I've read, though manufacturing jobs have been in decline for decades, the U.S. share of world manufacturing has remained steady since the 1970's. We've just become far more productive at it. There's no way for an economy to grow unless there are new, cheap ways to make goods. Job losses in that area are simply the trade off we have to deal with. Chemistry is just another casualty who's time has come.
ReplyDeleteI'm always curious when I see these charts, what *are* all the health care jobs that are being added? Are these doctors or anyone with high-level training, or just, say, medical assistant types?
ReplyDeleteA2:37p:
ReplyDeleteThis BLS table says a little of both:
Fastest growing occupations [2008-2018]
1. Biomedical engineers
3. Home health aides
4. Personal and home health aides
6. Physician assistants
11. Physical therapist aides
12. Dental hygienists
14. Dental assistants
16. Medical assistants
P.S. Here's the table: http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_103.htm
ReplyDeleteDon't know if you saw this, but it looked like something you would like to play with. The WSJ went through the BLS stats and has a tool to let you graph unemployment by profession. It is searchable.
ReplyDeletehttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791904576075652301620440.html
For "chemist and material scientist" it shows unemployment dropping from 4.5 to 3.1 in 2009-2010, but the total employed dropping from 113K to 103K at the same time, suggesting lots of chemists leaving the workforce or finding something else to do.
A5:19p: That's pretty cool! Thanks!
ReplyDelete