Note: BLS manufacturing statistics for the chemicals subsector does include the pharma manufacturing as well. |
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1. HELPING CHEMISTS FIND JOBS IN A TOUGH MARKET. 2. TOWARDS A QUANTITATIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE QUALITY OF THE CHEMISTRY JOB MARKET.
Note: BLS manufacturing statistics for the chemicals subsector does include the pharma manufacturing as well. |
What's the job market like for chemists? Dude -- it's always bad.*
How bad is it? How the heck should I know? Quantifying the chemistry job market is what this blog is about. That, and helping chemists find jobs.
E-mail chemjobber with helpful tips, career questions or angry comments at chemjobber -at- gmail dotcom. All correspondence is kept confidential. (Didn't get an e-mail back? It's okay to try again.) Please address correspondence to "Chemjobber" or "CJ."
Voicemail/SMS: (302) 313-6257
Twitter: @chemjobber
RSS feed here
(The Blogger spam filter gets hungry sometimes, and likes to eat comments. You can e-mail me, and sometimes I can get it to cough up your comment. I am always happy to try.)
(*For the literal-minded, this is a joke. Mostly.)
Am I reading this correctly? Thin grey line indicates a subsector?
ReplyDeleteSo, there's a subsector of chemical employment out there that's lost nearly 40% of its employees in 4 years?
Is that the Pharma line? :(
Dotted one is chemicals subsector.
ReplyDeleteIn non-durable goods manufacturing, the thin grey line that has taken the biggest beating (the one on the bottom) is textile mills. 180k to 122k. China, all China, there.
CJ - I don't agree that textile mills have taken the biggest beating. So they lost 58k jobs. Chemicals and plastics lost 226k with chemicals still dropping. But really to me it looks that it is printing, 163k jobs lost and still in steep decline, that is heading for the crapper.
ReplyDeleteThey've got to start putting that last one in ironic quotes.
ReplyDelete1)Before Recession
2)Recession
3)"Recovery"
With all the fantastic news lately, should change the name of this site to ChemSobber....
ReplyDeleteCS just doesn't have the same ring.
ReplyDeleteSure it does! There's jobs in CS.
ReplyDelete(Get it?)
It must totally suck to work at Pfizer.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-07/pfizer-may-seek-1-billion-in-yearly-cost-cuts-wsj-says.html?cmpid=yhoo
"It must totally suck to work at Pfizer."
ReplyDeleteQuestion is, where does it not suck to work? Who is not cutting?
From where I sit it looks like bio is the hot field.
ReplyDeleteU.S. Unemployment may stay at 8-9% for a very long time according to this study:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.politiquessociales.net/IMG/pdf/US-EU-UR-2009-05.pdf