Tuesday, June 6, 2017
Is there a correlation between the number of applications to faculty positions and phone interviews?
Labels:
faculty search
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1. HELPING CHEMISTS FIND JOBS IN A TOUGH MARKET. 2. TOWARDS A QUANTITATIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE QUALITY OF THE CHEMISTRY JOB MARKET.
What's the job market like for chemists? Dude -- it's always bad.*
How bad is it? How the heck should I know? Quantifying the chemistry job market is what this blog is about. That, and helping chemists find jobs.
E-mail chemjobber with helpful tips, career questions or angry comments at chemjobber -at- gmail dotcom. All correspondence is kept confidential. (Didn't get an e-mail back? It's okay to try again.) Please address correspondence to "Chemjobber" or "CJ."
Voicemail/SMS: (302) 313-6257
Twitter: @chemjobber
RSS feed here
(The Blogger spam filter gets hungry sometimes, and likes to eat comments. You can e-mail me, and sometimes I can get it to cough up your comment. I am always happy to try.)
(*For the literal-minded, this is a joke. Mostly.)
I didn't look through the raw data, but did the number of interviews account for ones that were turned down due to recently made/accepted offers?
ReplyDeleteGreat work Chemjobber! To me this graph looks just about as expected. There are the superstars, who get an interview for almost every application submitted. On the other side there are a bunch of candidates who get 0 or 1 interviews regardless of how many applications submitted. In the middle there is a trend of about 1 interview for about every 6 applications.
ReplyDeleteA general question for any search committee members. What is the approximate ratio of phone interviews to onsite interviews? Five to one? Ten to one?
Our phone:onsite ratio was probably 5 to 1, and our total applicant:phone interview ratio was probably 10:1. It's just one data point, though.
DeleteProvide the standard deviation for the slope and we will have the answer to your question.
ReplyDeleteUnsure those points lie on a line, but I think we can agree they lie on a plane.
ReplyDeleteOf course, it's only as good as the data put in. May be some over inflating on the survey answers that skew one way or another. Who threw out 87 applications - were there 88 opportunities within a discipline/sub-discipline? That would be hard to believe, which again seems to skew the numbers.
ReplyDeleteThe person probably has a mixed degree/experience like materials which could argue for a polymer, inorganic, or organic-based position.
DeleteI would feel bad having spent the time putting together all materials for ~90 applications only to get 3 interviews... Unless he or she just used one generic package for virtually every application, which would then make sense why they had so many apps and so little call-backs.
several of my on-site interviews which led to offers had no phone or skype interview, just email contact
ReplyDeleteI also wonder if there's a correlation between institute type (i.e. R1 vs R2 vs PUI). Are there community college stats included here as well?
ReplyDeletemy experiences have been as follows:
Deleteinternational schools: two direct invites to interview by email, two asked to skype first
R1 schools: some had skype interview (very casual) and others had email invite for on-site with no phone or skype
R2 schools: very rigorous phone interview, then skype interview, then on-site
I guess this makes sense because I would guess with a small department and a smaller budget, you want to do as much of your screening as possible before committing money to bringing someone in.