1. HELPING CHEMISTS FIND JOBS IN A TOUGH MARKET. 2. TOWARDS A QUANTITATIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE QUALITY OF THE CHEMISTRY JOB MARKET.
 |
| Credit: Prof. Ed. Lazowska |
What's the job market like for chemists? Dude -- it's always bad.*
How bad is it? How the heck should I know? Quantifying the chemistry job market is what this blog is about. That, and helping chemists find jobs.
E-mail chemjobber with helpful tips, career questions or angry comments at chemjobber -at- gmail dotcom. All correspondence is kept confidential. (Didn't get an e-mail back? It's okay to try again.) Please address correspondence to "Chemjobber" or "CJ."
Voicemail/SMS: (302) 313-6257
Twitter: @chemjobber
RSS feed here
(The Blogger spam filter gets hungry sometimes, and likes to eat comments. You can e-mail me, and sometimes I can get it to cough up your comment. I am always happy to try.)
(*For the literal-minded, this is a joke. Mostly.)
I think there's and S&M joke in there somewhere.
ReplyDeleteWhat counts as a "Computer Occupation"? Does working for Geek Squad count?
ReplyDeleteThose S&M folks are getting the shaft.
ReplyDeleteAnd half of them love it.
ReplyDeleteNice Buffy reference.
ReplyDeleteConspiracy Theory: UW Prof gets paid by Microsoft to suggest big growth in demand for "Computer Occupations". Microsoft complains about lack of qualified workers in US and then points to said study to convince US Congress to increase Visas limits for applications to fill the demand. Results in qualified and available US candidates losing out to foreign imports more willing to accept low pay scales (which Microsoft uses to increase their profit margins). Plausible scenario?
ReplyDeleteUnless Microsoft has some means of influencing BLS economists and their models, I don't buy it.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteDeleted and replaced, to fix a typo.
ReplyDeleteJim Austin here, from Science Careers. Not really a conspiracy theory--more necessary due diligence. Lazowska is heavily involved in the industry, so skepticism is warranted. So his arguments--and his statistics--need to be judged on their merits. I reviewed those BLS numbers, and while I don't have a huge amount of confidence in any employment projections--including theirs--they are at least honest.
Hey, is it just me or are some of these capcha's impossible?
Sorry, forgot to mention: I'll be posting a followup to this post later today.
ReplyDeleteJim