Credit C&EN |
Personally, I think it should be the 2nd, but I guess it really depends on what the applied research/basic research breakout is...
1. HELPING CHEMISTS FIND JOBS IN A TOUGH MARKET. 2. TOWARDS A QUANTITATIVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE QUALITY OF THE CHEMISTRY JOB MARKET.
Credit C&EN |
What's the job market like for chemists? Dude -- it's always bad.*
How bad is it? How the heck should I know? Quantifying the chemistry job market is what this blog is about. That, and helping chemists find jobs.
E-mail chemjobber with helpful tips, career questions or angry comments at chemjobber -at- gmail dotcom. All correspondence is kept confidential. (Didn't get an e-mail back? It's okay to try again.) Please address correspondence to "Chemjobber" or "CJ." Greetings of "Hi" are undesired. Emails from faculty members are answered faster than those from departmental admins or HR staff.
Voicemail/SMS: (302) 313-6257
Twitter: @chemjobber
RSS feed here
(The Blogger spam filter gets hungry sometimes, and likes to eat comments. You can e-mail me, and sometimes I can get it to cough up your comment. I am always happy to try.)
(*For the literal-minded, this is a joke. Mostly.)
There's something wrong with the numbers, the whole NOAA budget is less than $6B.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if it is a typo and it's actually NASA, instead of NOAA?
DeleteYup, it's a NASA/NOAA swap: http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/16c.RD%20Agency.jpg
DeleteThis ordering doesn't surprise me. What is the top three you're expecting?
ReplyDeleteI would have expected it to be: 1. DOD 2. NIH 3. NSF
DeleteGuess I was wrong.
And what do you think the order *should* be?
DeleteThat DOD R&D budget is staggering!
ReplyDeleteThe EPA will need more funding to test and regulate compounds for the Chemical Safety Improvement act. I wonder if testing of industrial compounds constitutes R&D.
ReplyDeleteNo surprise here, most of my grad school projects were DOD/DARPA funded, my boss always went for those grants because that's where the money was.
ReplyDelete